Sedentary and physical activity time differs between self-reported ATLS-2 physical activity questionnaire and accelerometer measurements in adolescents and young adults in the United Arab Emirates.

BACKGROUND: Most young adults and adolescents in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) do not meet the established internationally recommended physical activity levels per day. The Arab Teen Lifestyle Study (ATLS) physical activity questionnaire has been recommended for measuring self-reported physical activity of Arab adolescents and young adults (aged 14 years to mid-twenties). The first version of the ATLS has been validated with accelerometers and pedometers (r ≤ 0.30). The revised version of the questionnaire (ATLS-2, 2021) needs further validation. The aim of this study was to validate the self-reported subjective sedentary and physical activity time of the ATLS-2 (revised version) physical activity questionnaire with that of Fibion accelerometer-measured data. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 131 healthy adolescents and young adults (aged 20.47 ± 2.16 [mean ± SD] years (range 14-25 years), body mass index 23.09 ± 4.45 (kg/m2) completed the ATLS-2 and wore the Fibion accelerometer for a maximum of 7 days. Participants (n = 131; 81% non-UAE Arabs (n = 106), 13% Asians (n = 17) and 6% Emiratis (n = 8)) with valid ATLS-2 data without missing scores and Fibion data of minimum 10 h/day for at least 3 weekdays and 1 weekend day were analyzed. Concurrent validity between the two methods was assessed by the Spearman rho correlation and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The questionnaire underestimated sedentary and physical activity time compared to the accelerometer data. Only negligible to weak correlations (r ≤ 0.12; p > 0.05) were found for sitting, walking, cycling, moderate intensity activity, high intensity activity and total activity time. In addition, a proportional/systematic bias was evident in the plots for all but two (walking and moderate intensity activity time) of the outcome measures of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, self-reported ATLS-2 sedentary and physical activity time had low correlation and agreement with objective Fibion accelerometer measurements in adolescents and young adults in the UAE. Therefore, sedentary and physical activity assessment for these groups should not be limited to self-reported measures.

Erratum to "A new accelerometer (Fibion) device provides valid sedentary and upright time measurements compared to the ActivPAL4 in healthy individuals" [Heliyon 8(10) (October 2022) e1103].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11103.].

A new accelerometer (Fibion) device provides valid sedentary and upright time measurements compared to the ActivPAL4 in healthy individuals.

Background: Thigh-worn accelerometers can accurately measure time spent sitting, standing and walking in free-living settings. Aim: To investigate the concurrent validity of a new Fibion accelerometer and a validated ActivPAL4 accelerometer for estimating sedentary and upright time in healthy individuals. Methods: A total of 29 healthy individuals, aged between 18 and 50 years, wore the Fibion and ActivPAL4 devices on the same thigh with a medical adhesive tape during one typical weekday. Concurrent validity of the Fibion and ActivPAL4 was assessed by comparing time spent in sitting, walking and standing using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients were ≥0.843 which indicated good to excellent validity between the two devices for measuring sedentary (sitting) and upright (standing and walking) time. Analysis of the Bland Altman plots revealed a reasonable agreement for sitting, standing and walking time between both devices. No proportional bias was evident in the Bland-Altman plots. Conclusion: The Fibion demonstrated good to excellent validity in measuring sedentary and upright time compared to the ActivPAL4 in healthy individuals.

Does Google Fit provide valid energy expenditure measurements of functional tasks compared to those of Fibion accelerometer in healthy individuals? A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Smartphone applications (e.g., Google Fit) may be a good alternative tool for accelerometers in estimating energy expenditure of physical activities because they are affordable, easy to use, and freely downloadable on smartphones. We aimed to determine the concurrent validity of the Fibion and Google Fit for measuring energy expenditure of functional tasks in healthy individuals. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 28 healthy individuals (21.25 ± 1.84 years) performed certain tasks (lying, standing, 6-min walk test, treadmill walking, stair climbing and cycling) for ∼90 min, while wearing a Fibion accelerometer on their thigh and having the Google Fit application in a smartphone placed in their trouser pocket. Concurrent validity between the energy expenditure data of the Google Fit and Fibion was assessed using the Spearman rho correlation coefficient (data were not normally distributed), Bland-Altman plots and linear regression. RESULTS: Neither energy expenditure for the whole duration nor for the tasks, except sitting + treadmill walking (r = 0.419, p = 0.027), showed significant correlations between the Google Fit and Fibion measurements. A proportional bias was evident for almost all comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The Google Fit did not provide valid energy expenditure measurements compared to the Fibion for most of the investigated tasks in healthy individuals.